I believe, indeed, it’ll have the contrary impact
2) “[Transgender everyone] result in the debate that a guy may be born in a woman’s muscles that is certainly in fact a quarrel that specifies a biological linkage between sex personality and biological gender.” This “born-in-the-wrong-body” story was, needless to say, invoked by some transgender visitors to just be sure to describe her activities; but this narrative has-been criticized from many views in the scholarly literature. This specific analytical separation has, unfortunately, being rather embedded in popular discourse; but among sex research scholars there isn’t any acceptance of on a clean split involving the personal while the biological (see Donna Haraway’s work from seventies and 1980s if you think this might be an innovative new development).
3) “I’m furthermore not objecting to transgender people. I’m objecting to defectively written rules in addition to foisting of ideological inspired legislation on a population that is not ready for it.” Ah, the old “you’re supposed too quickly” debate against civil rights.